Applied Linguistics and Pedagogy Studies Journal (ALPSJ) employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and rigor of published research. This process involves several key stakeholders:
1. Authors: Authors submit their manuscripts through the journal's online submission system.
2. Editors: The editorial team initially screens all submissions for adherence to journal scope, formatting guidelines, and ethical standards. Manuscripts deemed unsuitable are returned to authors.
3. Reviewers: Manuscripts that meet the initial screening criteria are sent to at least two independent, anonymous reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise and ability to provide insightful feedback.
4. Review Process: Reviewers assess manuscripts using a standardized assessment form that considers factors such as:
- Originality and significance of the research: Is the research novel and relevant to the field?
- Methodology: Is the research design appropriate and well-executed?
- Clarity and coherence of the writing: Is the manuscript well-written, clear, and easy to understand?
- Contribution to the field: Does the manuscript make a significant contribution to the understanding of language, AI, and power skills?
5. Feedback and Decisions: Reviewers submit their evaluations, which are then reviewed by the editors. Authors are provided with constructive feedback from reviewers, including suggestions for revisions.
6. Decision: Based on the reviewers' assessments and the editors' evaluation, a decision is made regarding publication:
- Acceptance: Manuscripts that meet the journal's high standards are accepted for publication after revisions.
- Revision: Manuscripts that require significant revisions are returned to authors for improvement.
- Rejection: Manuscripts that are not deemed suitable for publication are rejected.
ALPSJ is committed to a fair, transparent, and rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research.